I find “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” to be a fascinating
document because of how widely read, shared, and discussed. That specifically,
is fascinating because from my own personal experience (as well as observation
from and of others), there many teachers who still follow this “banking” method
of instruction. This material and philosophy has been around for a long time,
yet some teachers don’t see the problem with the banking dichotomy. The idea of
rejecting that notion is something that I’ve been very passionate about. So much
so, in fact, that it’s one of the main reasons that I have decided to pursue
teaching. I don’t believe for one second that my intellectual capability and
intelligence is above any of my students. Nor do I believe that my knowledge is
superior. I think where the superiority complex stems from improper cultivation
of teachers is many of them were trained during a period of curriculum that was
based on knowledge of the world and facts, as opposed to skills and
understanding of the knowledge.
Many would say that putting yourself on the level of the
students is a very postmodern approach. But I actually think it’s not. To me, focusing
on the growth of a students’ skills and wisdom, and not treating them as
inferior, is a way to reinforce their individuality. Teaching from this
perspective means to teach from the heart. This can be difficult and take a lot
of courage because it means making yourself vulnerable to your students. But once
you do that, it means the students can open themselves up as well. Like Freire
says, teachers and students can both learn side by side and strengthen each
other. In doing this, the students and the teacher will be stronger individuals,
with stronger self-efficacy, which in turn, produces better learning.
Comments
Post a Comment