Skip to main content

On Social Justice in the Classroom


In regard to social justice and its usage in the classroom, I had my own preconceived opinions and ideas about it. So I hoped that researching this topic would open up some perspectives for me and allow me to see different points of view. I also wanted to find a convincing argument for why it’s philosophically and politically sound to educate students as if they should be revolutionaries. Unfortunately, I did not. One of the first articles that pop up when you google the topic is by Edutopia.org and it’s called “Creating Classrooms for Social Justice”. From the header alone, I knew that there would be some holes to poke in this one.

The subtitle reads: “Teach your students about making positive change in the world by connecting with them, discussing real-world problems and multiple perspectives, creating classroom community, and including authentic assessment.” Like with all complex subjects, some of these claims I believe are valid and agreeable – others I think are just wrong. Obviously it’s important to teach students about real world problems, as well as working to think about solutions to those problems critically and effectively. I also think it’s equally important to consider “multiple perspectives”. These are crucial skills for everyday life outside of the classroom that I believe every student needs. HOWEVER, the first suggestion, that we should be teaching our students about making positive change in the world, is not at all what I think the goal of public education should be. If individual students feel inspired to make positive change, that is up to them. But as a teacher, I don’t believe that it’s my job to tell a student what they should and shouldn’t change in a society. That’s up to them to discover on their own, using the skills previously mentioned to enact the change they want based on their own individuality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Freire's "Pedagogy of the Oppresed"

I find “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” to be a fascinating document because of how widely read, shared, and discussed. That specifically, is fascinating because from my own personal experience (as well as observation from and of others), there many teachers who still follow this “banking” method of instruction. This material and philosophy has been around for a long time, yet some teachers don’t see the problem with the banking dichotomy. The idea of rejecting that notion is something that I’ve been very passionate about. So much so, in fact, that it’s one of the main reasons that I have decided to pursue teaching. I don’t believe for one second that my intellectual capability and intelligence is above any of my students. Nor do I believe that my knowledge is superior. I think where the superiority complex stems from improper cultivation of teachers is many of them were trained during a period of curriculum that was based on knowledge of the world and facts, as opposed to skills and un...

Common Core State Standards

My experience with Common Core begins with my high school education, where I was able to see firsthand the standards reforms happening in Washington State. At the time, the idea of Common Core State Standards was off-putting for a majority of my fellow students. We seemed to collectively agree that the standards appeared to be restricting our learning and creativity. But over time, as the standards have continued to be developed, and the implementation of those standards evolves, Common Core has become more palatable for me. The reading explains the goal of Common Core best when they quote, "standards provide a definition of what is possible, but standards are not curriculum documents". I think this sentiment is extremely important in understanding what the goal of Common Core standards are. Though my personal philosophy about education wouldn't include something like the state standards, they are a necessary and deeply integrated part of the public school system. Future...

Mass Media and Popular Culture in the Classroom

I thought this article brought up some really interesting and important ideas regarding popular media in the classroom – specifically, how to incorporate it in a useful and engaging way for students. The text’s ultimate purpose seemed to evoke Freire’s ideas about students using their literacy as a voice to enact social change. In the context of the article, this relates to mass media (books, news, film, television, social media, etc.) because the text makes the point that it is not neutral, and that there are messages being conveyed to the consumers of mass media from all perspectives and points of view. Learning to navigate a world in which information is constantly being poured into us through mass media is difficult and confusing, even for an adult. It must be even harder for adolescents, who are growing up and being cultivated by this mass media. However, I don’t think this should be the main focus of incorporating popular culture into classroom. I would choose to teach pop...