Skip to main content

Learning Letter

I found this course to be highly valuable in the skills and concepts it taught me. Specifically, I found the activities to be a lot of fun and encouraged me to challenge myself and my thoughts about teaching and learning. My favorite of the work completed in this course was the book talks - and I'm sure it is a favorite of many others too. It was just so exciting and refreshing to get to come to class every day and hear about something new from someone who was passionate about it. I also enjoyed getting to do mine. Sharing two of my favorite books with the class was enriching and I hoped they gained something out of it.

I also thought the complex, nuanced discussions we had about different theories and practices to be enlightening. The "social justice in the classroom" discussion was the most memorable one for me. Everyone had such fascinating, surprising insight on the topic - and I really came away with new ideas in my head about how to think about social justice. With all of our discussions and readings, I really appreciated and enjoyed the honesty my classmates brought with them to class. No one was afraid to speak their mind in intelligent, thoughtful ways.

What influenced me most when it comes to self-efficacy as a teacher was the unit plan. As I mentioned in class, I came into the project assuming that my lessons (starting from scratch) would end up becoming more teacher-focused. Of course, the overarching goal was to help students learn in a meaningful way, but the activities and language in my head were still focused on what I was doing. It only took a few completed lesson plans for me to see that focusing on myself was detracting from the value of the unit itself and the potential learning the students could experience. Ultimately, shifting to a student-centered focus showed me the importance of making a class fun, engaging, and useful for the students - not for me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Freire's "Pedagogy of the Oppresed"

I find “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” to be a fascinating document because of how widely read, shared, and discussed. That specifically, is fascinating because from my own personal experience (as well as observation from and of others), there many teachers who still follow this “banking” method of instruction. This material and philosophy has been around for a long time, yet some teachers don’t see the problem with the banking dichotomy. The idea of rejecting that notion is something that I’ve been very passionate about. So much so, in fact, that it’s one of the main reasons that I have decided to pursue teaching. I don’t believe for one second that my intellectual capability and intelligence is above any of my students. Nor do I believe that my knowledge is superior. I think where the superiority complex stems from improper cultivation of teachers is many of them were trained during a period of curriculum that was based on knowledge of the world and facts, as opposed to skills and un...

Common Core State Standards

My experience with Common Core begins with my high school education, where I was able to see firsthand the standards reforms happening in Washington State. At the time, the idea of Common Core State Standards was off-putting for a majority of my fellow students. We seemed to collectively agree that the standards appeared to be restricting our learning and creativity. But over time, as the standards have continued to be developed, and the implementation of those standards evolves, Common Core has become more palatable for me. The reading explains the goal of Common Core best when they quote, "standards provide a definition of what is possible, but standards are not curriculum documents". I think this sentiment is extremely important in understanding what the goal of Common Core standards are. Though my personal philosophy about education wouldn't include something like the state standards, they are a necessary and deeply integrated part of the public school system. Future...

Mass Media and Popular Culture in the Classroom

I thought this article brought up some really interesting and important ideas regarding popular media in the classroom – specifically, how to incorporate it in a useful and engaging way for students. The text’s ultimate purpose seemed to evoke Freire’s ideas about students using their literacy as a voice to enact social change. In the context of the article, this relates to mass media (books, news, film, television, social media, etc.) because the text makes the point that it is not neutral, and that there are messages being conveyed to the consumers of mass media from all perspectives and points of view. Learning to navigate a world in which information is constantly being poured into us through mass media is difficult and confusing, even for an adult. It must be even harder for adolescents, who are growing up and being cultivated by this mass media. However, I don’t think this should be the main focus of incorporating popular culture into classroom. I would choose to teach pop...