Skip to main content

Discussion as a Way of Teaching

    From the start, the most interesting aspect of the article was the idea that the most productive and insightful discussion occurs among a group when the "ground rules" have been set. This includes expectations of how to behave, what to talk about, and how to talk go about with the discussion. I think it's easy for us to assume that a discussion can just begin by gathering together and asking a question or something simple like that. But really we know as students ourselves that everyone wants to know what to talk about. Setting the ground rules and the expectations will also help quieter members of the group speak up and gain confidence and security in knowing they will be heard. The more prepared the discussion leader AND the members of the discussion are, the better and more productive the discussion will be. Everyone will be on the same page and in the same mindset.

    One of the ideas for discussion activities that piqued my curiosity was the "rotating group" idea. Part of me resisted this at first because it seemed quite literally all over the place. Having students respond to so many different ideas in 10 minute increments seems too fast and furious. But I can understand and see how it might be beneficial overall. The first obvious benefit is the movement involved. Students will be walking around and doing more physical activity which is better than sitting around. It gets the students excited and productive. Another benefit I came to see was the immediate conversation starters produced by the previous groups' ideas. The students have something to draw from and talk about. It subtracts the time it takes to awkwardly stand and wait for someone to say something and start any real meaningful discussion. It also allows the overall learning experience to deepen and continue at larger rate - including a more diverse range of ideas.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Freire's "Pedagogy of the Oppresed"

I find “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” to be a fascinating document because of how widely read, shared, and discussed. That specifically, is fascinating because from my own personal experience (as well as observation from and of others), there many teachers who still follow this “banking” method of instruction. This material and philosophy has been around for a long time, yet some teachers don’t see the problem with the banking dichotomy. The idea of rejecting that notion is something that I’ve been very passionate about. So much so, in fact, that it’s one of the main reasons that I have decided to pursue teaching. I don’t believe for one second that my intellectual capability and intelligence is above any of my students. Nor do I believe that my knowledge is superior. I think where the superiority complex stems from improper cultivation of teachers is many of them were trained during a period of curriculum that was based on knowledge of the world and facts, as opposed to skills and un...

Common Core State Standards

My experience with Common Core begins with my high school education, where I was able to see firsthand the standards reforms happening in Washington State. At the time, the idea of Common Core State Standards was off-putting for a majority of my fellow students. We seemed to collectively agree that the standards appeared to be restricting our learning and creativity. But over time, as the standards have continued to be developed, and the implementation of those standards evolves, Common Core has become more palatable for me. The reading explains the goal of Common Core best when they quote, "standards provide a definition of what is possible, but standards are not curriculum documents". I think this sentiment is extremely important in understanding what the goal of Common Core standards are. Though my personal philosophy about education wouldn't include something like the state standards, they are a necessary and deeply integrated part of the public school system. Future...

Mass Media and Popular Culture in the Classroom

I thought this article brought up some really interesting and important ideas regarding popular media in the classroom – specifically, how to incorporate it in a useful and engaging way for students. The text’s ultimate purpose seemed to evoke Freire’s ideas about students using their literacy as a voice to enact social change. In the context of the article, this relates to mass media (books, news, film, television, social media, etc.) because the text makes the point that it is not neutral, and that there are messages being conveyed to the consumers of mass media from all perspectives and points of view. Learning to navigate a world in which information is constantly being poured into us through mass media is difficult and confusing, even for an adult. It must be even harder for adolescents, who are growing up and being cultivated by this mass media. However, I don’t think this should be the main focus of incorporating popular culture into classroom. I would choose to teach pop...