Skip to main content

On Assessment and Standards-Based Grading


Assessment is one of those topics that appears to be daunting to me at first, but the more I think about it, and the more I read about it, the more I feel comfortable with it. I don’t think it’s really as tricky as topic as some people like to make it out to be. The handout provided offered some really good in depth looks at the different ways teachers can assess their students’ knowledge and understanding. It took a very neutral stance, investigating the pros and cons of all kinds of approaches. There wasn’t any tactics of assessment that I found particularly abhorrent. They all work in their own ways. I just think in order to have good assessment there needs to be a common, solid ground to base the assessment on. That’s where the debate comes to. This leads to the article about standards based grading.

I think standards based grading, on a philosophical level, is a sound way to approach assessment. The issue arises when we talk about what specifically the standards are, and whether the standards we are grading are proper or beneficial to the student. The assessment article does a good job of describing the issue with “knowledge-based” assessment (which asserts that the testing of students should be on how much they know, ‘knowledge is learning’). I think that viewpoint in fundamentally flawed because a student can remember and know a lot without understanding it or applying it to their lives. This has been a common criticism with the idea of state standards. When they first became a prominent political/pedagogical discussion, the fear was that the standards aren’t testing students on relevant skills and knowledge that can benefit themselves economically and socially. And to some extent, I do agree with that sentiment. There are aspects of assessment and standards I don’t agree. More recently, the way in which we test students at the state level.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Freire's "Pedagogy of the Oppresed"

I find “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” to be a fascinating document because of how widely read, shared, and discussed. That specifically, is fascinating because from my own personal experience (as well as observation from and of others), there many teachers who still follow this “banking” method of instruction. This material and philosophy has been around for a long time, yet some teachers don’t see the problem with the banking dichotomy. The idea of rejecting that notion is something that I’ve been very passionate about. So much so, in fact, that it’s one of the main reasons that I have decided to pursue teaching. I don’t believe for one second that my intellectual capability and intelligence is above any of my students. Nor do I believe that my knowledge is superior. I think where the superiority complex stems from improper cultivation of teachers is many of them were trained during a period of curriculum that was based on knowledge of the world and facts, as opposed to skills and un...

Common Core State Standards

My experience with Common Core begins with my high school education, where I was able to see firsthand the standards reforms happening in Washington State. At the time, the idea of Common Core State Standards was off-putting for a majority of my fellow students. We seemed to collectively agree that the standards appeared to be restricting our learning and creativity. But over time, as the standards have continued to be developed, and the implementation of those standards evolves, Common Core has become more palatable for me. The reading explains the goal of Common Core best when they quote, "standards provide a definition of what is possible, but standards are not curriculum documents". I think this sentiment is extremely important in understanding what the goal of Common Core standards are. Though my personal philosophy about education wouldn't include something like the state standards, they are a necessary and deeply integrated part of the public school system. Future...

Mass Media and Popular Culture in the Classroom

I thought this article brought up some really interesting and important ideas regarding popular media in the classroom – specifically, how to incorporate it in a useful and engaging way for students. The text’s ultimate purpose seemed to evoke Freire’s ideas about students using their literacy as a voice to enact social change. In the context of the article, this relates to mass media (books, news, film, television, social media, etc.) because the text makes the point that it is not neutral, and that there are messages being conveyed to the consumers of mass media from all perspectives and points of view. Learning to navigate a world in which information is constantly being poured into us through mass media is difficult and confusing, even for an adult. It must be even harder for adolescents, who are growing up and being cultivated by this mass media. However, I don’t think this should be the main focus of incorporating popular culture into classroom. I would choose to teach pop...