Assessment is one of those topics that appears to be
daunting to me at first, but the more I think about it, and the more I read
about it, the more I feel comfortable with it. I don’t think it’s really as
tricky as topic as some people like to make it out to be. The handout provided offered
some really good in depth looks at the different ways teachers can assess their
students’ knowledge and understanding. It took a very neutral stance, investigating
the pros and cons of all kinds of approaches. There wasn’t any tactics of assessment
that I found particularly abhorrent. They all work in their own ways. I just
think in order to have good assessment there needs to be a common, solid ground
to base the assessment on. That’s where the debate comes to. This leads to the
article about standards based grading.
I think standards based grading, on a philosophical level,
is a sound way to approach assessment. The issue arises when we talk about what
specifically the standards are, and whether the standards we are grading are proper
or beneficial to the student. The assessment article does a good job of
describing the issue with “knowledge-based” assessment (which asserts that the
testing of students should be on how much they know, ‘knowledge is learning’).
I think that viewpoint in fundamentally flawed because a student can remember
and know a lot without understanding it or applying it to their lives. This has
been a common criticism with the idea of state standards. When they first became
a prominent political/pedagogical discussion, the fear was that the standards aren’t
testing students on relevant skills and knowledge that can benefit themselves economically
and socially. And to some extent, I do agree with that sentiment. There are
aspects of assessment and standards I don’t agree. More recently, the way in which
we test students at the state level.
Comments
Post a Comment